Connect with us

News

The current Sports act amended

Published

on

Due to the deficiencies in the current Sports Act, the Act has been amended. Mr Janadiphita has appointed a committee for these amendments, so Mr Malik Samaraweera has been appointed as the chairman of that committee. The revised new facts are as follows.

The main positions (Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer) of sports associations can be held only twice for two years each. This law will affect national associations, provincial associations, district associations and regional associations in the same way. According to the amendment, the maximum tenure is 4 years. If he has held the office of Chairman for two terms (04 years), he shall be disqualified for re-election to the office of Chairman. Nevertheless, it should not be a hindrance to hold committee membership for another four (04) years. Having held office for four (04) terms (a term of eight (08) years), shall be ineligible for re-election and shall also be ineligible for committee membership. However, this should not be a hindrance if the officers of any association are appointed at the time these orders come into force till the end of their tenure.

If for any reason an official or committee member has been removed, punished or suspended for disciplinary reasons by the International Association or its affiliates under a formal investigation under the Sports Act, such removal, punishment or suspension of A person who has been appointed shall be ineligible for re-election to that office or committee membership.

In the event that any member of the executive committee, including the chairman, secretary, or treasurer, acts contrary to the sports act, regulations, directives and the constitution of the said national sports association, the federation, a resolution carried by a voting member of the relevant association, the federation by a simple majority of the voting members by convening a special general assembly or In a council meeting, the association can be removed from office even before the completion of the relevant term by a 2/3 majority of the voting members of the federation.

Under the new amendments, dual citizens will be barred from contesting any post in a sports body.

Meanwhile, it is stated that the maximum age limit for holding a position in a sports organization has also been revised to 70 years. The retirement of judges has been capped at 60 years.

In relation to players with special needs, the National Sports Association for Handicapped Players is responsible for including a subsidiary association consisting of people with special needs for the sports of the National Sports Association for their disabled players.

Athletes and other officials participating in sports representing Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka or abroad for any undisciplined behaviour or behaviour that brings Sri Lanka into disrepute or dereliction of responsibility by a formal investigation panel appointed by the Minister in charge of the Ministry of Records or the Director General. Upon recommendation, a penalty, ban or suspension may be imposed against the players, officials or sports association.

National Sports Associations should act in accordance with the financial law of the country and should be submitted to the recommendation of the minister in charge of the subject in connection with international agreements and international financial transactions.

Accountability of regional sports associations is between District Sports Associations, and Provincial Sports Associations and the responsibility of regulating them is assigned to the District, Provincial and National Sports Associations.

A person holding the office of President, Secretary, Treasurer, Vice/Deputy President, Vice/Deputy Secretary, Deputy/Deputy Treasurer of a National Sports Association, a Provincial Sports Association, a District Sports Association or an affiliated sports club in his National Sports Association or any other National Sports Association, shall be disqualified from holding any office in a Provincial Sports Association, a District Sports Association, a Regional Sports Club or an Affiliated Sports Club or any other National Sports Association.

Annually submitted by the concerned National Sports Association/Confederation to the Director General of Sports regarding all activities including the elections of sports clubs, institutions, district sports associations, provincial sports associations or sports clubs affiliated to a district or provincial association and affiliated member organizations affiliated to a National Sports Association/Confederation. must.

The Director General of Sports shall set up a program to carry out full supervision of all the aforementioned sports associations, clubs and affiliated institutions. The Director General of Sports should supervise the District Sports Associations by the Sports Director of the respective district.

The Director General of Sports shall supervise the Provincial Sports Associations through the Director of Sports of the respective Province, and such supervision shall be done in accordance with the regulations introduced by the respective Provincial Councils in accordance with the National Sports Policy.

To establish the National Sports Association, the District Sports Association shall have one vote, the Provincial Association shall have one vote, and the Special Sports Association shall have one vote. (Specialized sports associations or pioneer sports associations are sports clubs that existed before the formation of sports associations.)

Similarly, an official selection committee has also been appointed for the official election of the Sri Lanka Cricket Institute to be held next year.

Retired Court of Appeal Judge Malini Gunaratne, Retired High Court Judge Shiromi Perera and Sunil Sirisena, a retired senior administrative officer.

වත්මන් ක්‍රීඩා පනත සංශෝධනය කෙරේ

වත්මන් ක්‍රීඩා පනතේ පැවති අඩුපාඩු හේතුවෙන් එම පනත සංශෝධනයට ලක්ව තිබේ. ජානාධිපති තුමා විසින් මෙම සංශෝදනයන් සදහා කමිටුවක් පත් කර ඇති බැවින් එම කමිටුවේ සභාපති ලෙසෙ මලික් සමරවීර මහතා පත් කොට ඇත. සංශෝධනය කෙරූ නව කරුණු මෙසේය.

ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් වල ප්‍රධාන තනතුරු (සභාපති, ලේකම්, භාණ්ඩාගාරික) ධූරය හෙබවිය හැක්කේ වසර දෙක බැගින් දෙවතාවක් පමණි. මෙම නීතිය ජාතික සංගම්, පළාත් සංගම්, දිස්ත්‍රික් සංගම්, ප්‍රාදේශීය සංගම් වලටද එලෙසින්ම බලපානු ඇත. එම සංශෝදනයට අනුව උපරිම ධුර කාලය වසර 4කි. ධුර කාල දෙකක් (වසර 04ක්) සභාපති ධූරය දරා ඇත්නම්, නැවත සභාපති ධූරයට තේරී පත්වීමට නුසුදුස්සකු විය යුතු ය. එසේ වුවද, තවත් වසර හතරක (04) කාලයක් කමිටු සාමාජිකත්වය දැරීමට එය බාධාවක් නොවිය යුතු ය. ධුර කාල හතරක් (04) (වසර අටක (08) ධුර කාලයක් ) ධුර දරා ඇත්නම්, නැවත තේරී පත්වීමට නුසුදුස්සකු විය යුතු අතර කමිටු සාමාජිකත්වය දැරීමට ද නුසුදුස්සකු විය යුතු ය. කෙසේ වෙතත් මෙම නියෝග බලාත්මක වන විට යම් සංගමයක නිළධාරීන් පත්ව ඇත්නම් ඔවුන්ගේ ධුර කාලය අවසාන වන තෙක් මෙය බාධාවක් නොවිය යුතුය.

යම් හෙයකින් නිලධාරියෙකු හෝ කමිටු සාමාජිකයෙකු විසින් ක්‍රීඩා පනත යටතේ පැවැත්වූ විධිමත් පරීක්ෂණයක් යටතේ ජාත්‍යන්තර සංගමය හෝ ඊට අනුබද්ධ ආයතනයක් විසින් විනය හේතූන් මත ඉවත් කරනු ලැබුවේ නම් හෝ දඬුවමකට ලක් කරනු ලැබුවේ නම් හෝ තහනමකට ලක් කරනු ලැබුවේ නම් එකී ඉවත් කිරීම, දඬුවමකට ලක් කිරීම හෝ තහනමකට ලක් කරන ලද අයෙකුට එකී ධුරයට හෝ කමිටු සාමාජිකත්වයට නැවත තෝරා පත් කර ගැනීමට නුසුදුස්සකු වන්නේ ය.

සභාපති, ලේකම්, භාණ්ඩාගාරික ඇතුළු ඕනෑම විධායක කමිටු සාමාජිකයකු, ක්‍රීඩා පනත, රෙගුලාසි, විධාන හා එකී ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයේ, සම්මේලනයේ ව්‍යවස්ථාවට පටහැනිව කටයුතු කරන අවස්ථාවක අදාළ සංගමයේ, සම්මේලනයේ ඡන්ද හිමි සාමාජිකයකු විසින් ඡන්ද හිමි සාමාජිකයින්ගේ සරල බහුතරයකින් ගෙනෙන යෝජනාවක් විශේෂ මහා සභාවක් කැඳවීමෙන් හෝ මහා සභා රැස්වීමකදී, සංගමයේ, සම්මේලනයේ ඡන්ද හිමි සාමාජිකයින්ගේ 2/3ක බහුතරයෙන් සම්මත කර ගැනීමෙන්, අදාළ ධුර කාලය සම්පූර්ණ වීමට පෙර වුව ද ධුරයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීමට හැකිව පවතී.

නව සංශෝධන යටතේ ද්විත්ව පුරවැසියන් සඳහා ක්‍රීඩා ආයතනයක කිසිදු තනතුරකට තරග කිරීම තහනම් වනු ඇත.

මේ අතර, ක්‍රීඩා ආයතනයක තනතුරක් දැරීමට ඇති උපරිම වයස් සීමාව ද අවුරුදු 70ක් ලෙස සංශෝධනය වී ඇති බව සඳහන්. විනිසුරුවරුන්ගේ විශ්‍රාම යාම වසර 60 දක්වා සීමා කිරීම් සිදු කොට ඇත.

විශේෂ අවශ්‍යතා සහිත ක්‍රීඩකයින් සම්භන්ධයෙන්, ආබාධිත ක්‍රීඩකයන් සදහා වන ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමය තම අබාධිත ක්‍රීඩකයන් සදහා ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයේ අදාල ක්‍රීඩා සදහා විශේෂ අවශ්‍යතා සහිත පුද්ගලයින් සමන්විත අනුබද්ධ සමිතියක් ඇතුළත් කර ගැනීමට වගකීමක් කර ගැනීම.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාව නියෝජනය කරමින් ක්‍රීඩා වලට සහභාගී වන ක්‍රීඩකයින් හා අනෙකුත් නිළධාරීන් ශ්‍රී ලංකවේදී හෝ විදේශයකදී කරනු ලබන විනය විරෝදී හැසිරීමක් හෝ ශ්‍රී ලංකාව අපකීර්තියට පත් කරන හැසිරීමක් හෝ වගකීම පැහැර හැරීමක් විශය භාර අමාත්‍යවරයා, අමාත්‍යංශයේ ලේඛම් හෝ අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල් වරයා විසින් පත් කරනු ලැබූ විධිමත් පරීක්ෂණ මණ්ඩලයක් මගින් ලබා දෙන නිර්දේශය මත, ක්‍රීඩකයන්ට, නිලධාරීන්ට හෝ ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයට එරෙහිව දඩුවමක්, තහනමක් හෝ අත්හිටුවීමක් ක්‍රියාත්මක කළ හැක.

ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් ජාත්‍යන්තර ගිවිසුම් හා ජාත්‍යන්තර මුදල් ගණුදෙනු වලට එලබීමේදී රටේ මූල්‍ය නීතියට යටත්ව, විනිවිධ භාවයෙන් යුතුව ක්‍රියා කළ යුතු අතර විශය භාර අමාත්‍යවරයාගේ නිර්දේෂයට ඉදිරිපත් කළ යුතුය.

ප්‍රාදේශීය ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් වල වගවීම දිස්ත්‍රික් ක්‍රීඩා සංගම්, පළාත් ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් අතර වන අතර ඒවා නියාමනය කිරීමේ වගකීම දිස්ත්‍රික්, පළාත් හා ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයට පැවරේ.

ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයක, පළාත් ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයක, දිස්ත්‍රික් ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයක හෝ අනුබද්ධ ක්‍රීඩා සමාජයක සභාපති, ලේකම්, භාණ්ඩාගාරික, උප/නියෝජ්‍ය සභාපති, උප/නියෝජ්‍ය ලේකම්, උප/නියෝජ්‍ය භාණ්ඩාගාරික යන ධූරයක් දරන යම් තැනැත්තෙකු තම ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයේ හෝ වෙනත් යම් ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයක, පළාත් ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයක, දිස්ත්‍රික් ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයක ප්‍රාදේශිය ක්‍රීඩා සාමාජයක හෝ අනුබද්ධ ක්‍රීඩා සමාජයක හෝ වෙනත් කිසිදු ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයක කිසිදු ධූරයක් දැරීමට නුසුදුස්සකු වන්නේ ය.

ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයකට/ සම්මේලනයකට අනුබද්ධ ක්‍රීඩා සමාජ, ආයතන, දිස්ත්‍රික් ක්‍රීඩා සංගම්, පළාත් ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් හෝ දිස්ත්‍රික් හෝ පළාත් සංගමයකට අනුබද්ධ ක්‍රීඩා සමාජ හා අනුබද්ධ සාමාජික සංවිධානවල නිලවරණයන් ඇතුළු සියලු ක්‍රියාකාරීත්වයන් සම්බන්ධයෙන් තොරතුරු අදාළ ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමය/ සම්මේලනය විසින් ක්‍රීඩා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල්වරයා වෙත වාර්ෂිකව ඉදිරිපත් කළ යුතු ය.

ක්‍රීඩා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල්වරයා ඉහත සඳහන් සියළු ක්‍රීඩා සංගම්, සමාජ හා අනුබද්ධ ආයතන පිළිබඳ පූර්ණ අධීක්ෂණයක් සිදු කිරීම සඳහා වැඩපිළිවෙලක් සැකසිය යුතුය. ක්‍රීඩා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල්වරයා විසින් දිස්ත්‍රික් ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් අධීක්ෂණය ඒ ඒ දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ ක්‍රීඩා අධ්‍යක්ෂකවරයා මගින් සිදු කළ යුතුය.

ක්‍රීඩා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල්වරයා විසින් පළාත් ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් අධීක්ෂණය ඒ ඒ පළාතේ ක්‍රීඩා අධ්‍යක්ෂකවරයා මගින් සිදු කළ යුතු අතර, එකී අධීක්ෂණ කටයුතු ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා ප්‍රතිපත්තියට අනුකූල වන සේ ඒ ඒ පළාත් සභාව විසින් ප්‍රඥප්ති මගින් හඳුන්වා දී ඇති විධි විධාන ප්‍රකාරව සිදු කළ යුතුය.

ජාතික ක්‍රීඩා සංගමය පිහිටුවීමට දිස්ත්‍රික් ක්‍රීඩා සංගමයට එක් ඡන්දයක්, පළාත් සංගමයට එක් ඡන්දයක්, විශේෂ වූ ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් සදහා එක් ඡන්දයක් හිමි වේ. ( විශේෂ වූ ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් හෝ පුරෝගාමී ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් යනු ක්‍රීඩා සංගම් බිහි වීමට පෙර පැවති ක්‍රීඩා සමාජයන්ය.)

එසේ ම ලබන වසරේ පැවැත්වීමට නියමිත ශ්‍රී ලංකා ක්‍රිකට් ආයතනයේ නිලවරණය සඳහා නිලවරණ කමිටුවක් ද පත් කර තිබෙනවා.

විශ්‍රාමලත් අභියාචනාධිකරණ විනිසුරු මාලිනී ගුණරත්න, විශ්‍රාමලත් මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ශිරෝමි පෙරේරා සහ විශ්‍රාමික ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ පරිපාලන නිලධාරියෙකු වන සුනිල් සිරිසේන ඊට ඇතුළත් වේ.

தற்போதைய விளையாட்டு மாற்றப்பட்டது

தற்போதைய விளையாட்டு சட்டத்தில் உள்ள குறைபாடுகள் காரணமாக, சட்டத்தில் திருத்தம் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது. இந்த திருத்தங்களுக்கு ஜனாதிபித குழுவொன்றை நியமித்துள்ளதால், அந்த குழுவின் தலைவராக திரு.மலிக் சமரவீர நியமிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளார். திருத்தப்பட்ட புதிய உண்மைகள் பின்வருமாறு.

விளையாட்டு சங்கங்களின் முக்கிய பதவிகள் (தலைவர், செயலாளர், பொருளாளர்) தலா இரண்டு ஆண்டுகளுக்கு இரண்டு முறை மட்டுமே இருக்க முடியும். தேசிய சங்கங்கள், மாகாண சங்கங்கள், மாவட்ட சங்கங்கள் மற்றும் பிராந்திய சங்கங்கள் போன்றவற்றையும் இந்த சட்டம் பாதிக்கும். திருத்தத்தின்படி, அதிகபட்ச பதவிக்காலம் 4 ஆண்டுகள். அவர் இரண்டு முறை (04 ஆண்டுகள்) தலைவர் பதவியை வகித்திருந்தால், அவர் தலைவர் பதவிக்கு மீண்டும் தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்படுவதற்கு தகுதியற்றவர். இருந்தபோதிலும், இன்னும் நான்கு (04) வருடங்கள் குழு அங்கத்துவத்தை வைத்திருப்பதற்கு அது தடையாக இருக்கக்கூடாது. நான்கு (04) தவணைகள் (எட்டு (08) ஆண்டுகள்) பதவியில் இருந்திருந்தால், மறுதேர்தலுக்குத் தகுதியற்றவர் மற்றும் குழு உறுப்பினர் பதவிக்கும் தகுதியற்றவர். இருப்பினும், இந்த உத்தரவுகள் அமலுக்கு வரும் நேரத்தில், அவர்களின் பதவிக்காலம் முடியும் வரை, ஏதேனும் ஒரு சங்கத்தின் நிர்வாகிகள் நியமிக்கப்பட்டால், இது தடையாக இருக்கக்கூடாது.

எந்தவொரு காரணத்திற்காகவும் ஒரு அதிகாரி அல்லது குழு உறுப்பினர் ஒழுக்கக் காரணங்களுக்காக சர்வதேச சங்கம் அல்லது அதன் துணை அமைப்புகளால் விளையாட்டுச் சட்டத்தின் கீழ் முறையான விசாரணையின் கீழ் நீக்கப்பட்டால், தண்டனை அல்லது இடைநீக்கம் செய்யப்பட்டால், அத்தகைய நீக்கம், தண்டனை அல்லது இடைநீக்கம் நியமிக்கப்பட்ட நபர் தகுதியற்றவர். அந்த அலுவலகம் அல்லது குழு உறுப்பினர் பதவிக்கு மறுதேர்தல்.

தலைவர், செயலாளர், பொருளாளர் உட்பட செயற்குழு உறுப்பினர் எவரேனும், விளையாட்டுச் சட்டம், விதிமுறைகள், உத்தரவுகள் மற்றும் மேற்படி தேசிய விளையாட்டு சங்கத்தின் அரசியலமைப்புச் சட்டத்திற்கு முரணாகச் செயல்பட்டால், கூட்டமைப்பு, வாக்களிக்கும் உறுப்பினர் நிறைவேற்றும் தீர்மானம் சிறப்புப் பொதுக்குழு அல்லது கவுன்சில் கூட்டத்தை கூட்டுவதன் மூலம், சம்பந்தப்பட்ட சங்கம், வாக்களிக்கும் உறுப்பினர்களின் எளிய பெரும்பான்மையால் கூட்டமைப்பு, 2/3 பெரும்பான்மை வாக்கெடுப்பு மூலம் தொடர்புடைய பதவிக்காலம் முடிவதற்கு முன்பே சங்கத்தை பதவியில் இருந்து நீக்க முடியும். கூட்டமைப்பின் உறுப்பினர்கள்.

புதிய திருத்தங்களின்படி, இரட்டைக் குடியுரிமை பெற்றவர்கள் விளையாட்டு அமைப்பில் எந்தப் பதவியிலும் போட்டியிட தடை விதிக்கப்படும்.

இதேவேளை, விளையாட்டு நிறுவனத்தில் பதவி வகிப்பதற்கான அதிகபட்ச வயது வரம்பு 70 ஆகவும் மாற்றியமைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாக தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. நீதிபதிகளின் ஓய்வு காலம் 60 ஆண்டுகளாக குறைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

சிறப்புத் தேவையுடைய வீரர்களைப் பொறுத்தவரை, ஊனமுற்ற வீரர்களுக்கான தேசிய விளையாட்டுக் கழகம், அவர்களின் ஊனமுற்ற வீரர்களுக்கான தேசிய விளையாட்டுக் கழகத்தின் விளையாட்டுகளில் சிறப்புத் தேவையுடையவர்களைக் கொண்ட துணைக் கழகத்தைச் சேர்ப்பதற்கு பொறுப்பாகும்.

பதிவேடு அமைச்சின் பொறுப்பான அமைச்சர் அல்லது பணிப்பாளரால் நியமிக்கப்பட்ட முறையான விசாரணைக் குழுவினால் இலங்கைக்கு அவப்பெயரை ஏற்படுத்தும் அல்லது பொறுப்பை மீறும் எந்தவொரு ஒழுக்கமற்ற நடத்தை அல்லது நடத்தைக்காக இலங்கையில் அல்லது வெளிநாட்டில் இலங்கையைப் பிரதிநிதித்துவப்படுத்தும் விளையாட்டு வீரர்கள் மற்றும் பிற அதிகாரிகள் பொதுவாக, பரிந்துரையின் பேரில், வீரர்கள், அதிகாரிகள் அல்லது விளையாட்டு சங்கத்திற்கு எதிராக அபராதம், தடை அல்லது இடைநீக்கம் விதிக்கப்படலாம்.

சர்வதேச உடன்படிக்கைகள் மற்றும் சர்வதேச நிதி பரிவர்த்தனைகள் தொடர்பில் தேசிய விளையாட்டுக் கழகங்கள் நாட்டின் நிதிச் சட்டத்திற்கு அமைவாக செயற்படுவதுடன், பாடத்திற்குப் பொறுப்பான அமைச்சரின் சிபாரிசுக்கு சமர்ப்பிக்கப்பட வேண்டும்.

பிராந்திய விளையாட்டுக் கழகங்களின் பொறுப்புக்கூறல் மாவட்ட விளையாட்டுச் சங்கங்கள், மாகாண விளையாட்டுச் சங்கங்களுக்கு இடையில் உள்ளது மற்றும் அவற்றை ஒழுங்குபடுத்தும் பொறுப்பு மாவட்ட, மாகாண மற்றும் தேசிய விளையாட்டுச் சங்கங்களுக்கு ஒதுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

தேசிய விளையாட்டு சங்கம், மாகாண விளையாட்டு சங்கம், மாவட்ட விளையாட்டு சங்கம் அல்லது தனது தேசிய விளையாட்டில் இணைந்த விளையாட்டுக் கழகத்தின் தலைவர், செயலாளர், பொருளாளர், துணை/துணைத் தலைவர், துணை/துணைச் செயலாளர், துணை/துணைப் பொருளாளர் ஆகிய பதவிகளை வகிக்கும் நபர். சங்கம் அல்லது வேறு ஏதேனும் தேசிய விளையாட்டு சங்கம், மாகாண விளையாட்டு சங்கம், மாவட்ட விளையாட்டு சங்கம், பிராந்திய விளையாட்டுக் கழகம் அல்லது இணைந்த விளையாட்டுக் கழகம் அல்லது வேறு ஏதேனும் தேசிய விளையாட்டுக் கழகம் ஆகியவற்றில் எந்தப் பதவியையும் வகிக்க தகுதியற்றது.

விளையாட்டுக் கழகங்கள், நிறுவனங்கள், மாவட்ட விளையாட்டு சங்கங்கள், மாகாண விளையாட்டு சங்கங்கள் அல்லது விளையாட்டுக் கழகங்கள் மற்றும் மாவட்ட அல்லது மாகாண சங்கம் மற்றும் அதனுடன் இணைந்த உறுப்பு அமைப்புகளின் தேர்தல்கள் உட்பட அனைத்துச் செயல்பாடுகள் தொடர்பாக விளையாட்டுப் பணிப்பாளர் நாயகத்திற்கு சம்பந்தப்பட்ட தேசிய விளையாட்டுச் சங்கம்/கூட்டமைப்பினால் ஆண்டுதோறும் சமர்ப்பிக்கப்படும். தேசிய விளையாட்டு சங்கம்/கூட்டமைப்புக்கு.

விளையாட்டுப் பணிப்பாளர் நாயகம் மேற்கூறிய அனைத்து விளையாட்டு சங்கங்கள், கிளப்புகள் மற்றும் அதனுடன் இணைந்த நிறுவனங்களின் முழு மேற்பார்வையை மேற்கொள்வதற்கான ஒரு திட்டத்தை அமைக்க வேண்டும். மாவட்ட விளையாட்டு சங்கங்களை அந்தந்த மாவட்ட விளையாட்டு இயக்குனர் மூலம் விளையாட்டுத்துறை இயக்குனர் ஜெனரல் கண்காணிக்க வேண்டும்.

விளையாட்டுப் பணிப்பாளர் நாயகம் அந்தந்த மாகாணத்தின் விளையாட்டுப் பணிப்பாளர் ஊடாக மாகாண விளையாட்டுச் சங்கங்களை மேற்பார்வையிடுவார், மேலும் தேசிய விளையாட்டுக் கொள்கையின்படி அந்தந்த மாகாண சபைகளால் அறிமுகப்படுத்தப்பட்ட ஒழுங்குமுறைகளுக்கு இணங்க அத்தகைய மேற்பார்வை செய்யப்பட வேண்டும்.

தேசிய விளையாட்டு சங்கத்தை நிறுவுவதற்கு, மாவட்ட விளையாட்டு சங்கத்திற்கு ஒரு வாக்கும், மாகாண சங்கத்திற்கு ஒரு வாக்கும், சிறப்பு விளையாட்டு சங்கத்திற்கு ஒரு வாக்கும் இருக்க வேண்டும். (சிறப்பு விளையாட்டு சங்கங்கள் அல்லது முன்னோடி விளையாட்டு சங்கங்கள் என்பது விளையாட்டு சங்கங்கள் உருவாவதற்கு முன்பு இருந்த விளையாட்டுக் கழகங்கள்.)

அதேபோன்று, அடுத்த வருடம் நடைபெறவுள்ள இலங்கை கிரிக்கெட் நிறுவனத்தின் உத்தியோகபூர்வ தேர்தலுக்கான உத்தியோகபூர்வ தெரிவுக்குழுவும் நியமிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

ஓய்வுபெற்ற மேன்முறையீட்டு நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி மாலினி குணரத்ன, ஓய்வுபெற்ற மேல் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி ஷிரோமி பெரேரா

Cricket

“It’s Not in My Hand” – Shanaka Leaves Captaincy Decision to Selectors After World Cup Exit

Published

on

By

Sri Lanka captain Dasun Shanaka has admitted that his future as T20 skipper is no longer in his control following the team’s early exit from the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup, stating that the decision now rests entirely with selectors and Sri Lanka Cricket.

“I don’t know how long I will be as captain. It’s not in my hand; it’s up to the selectors and Sri Lanka Cricket. I’m happy to lead this team. I have taken some good decisions; in the meantime, some didn’t go as planned,” Shanaka said after Sri Lanka’s 61-run defeat to New Zealand.

His remarks came at the end of a turbulent campaign that began with promise but ended in disappointment.

Tactical Misread Proves Costly

Shanaka openly acknowledged that misjudging conditions played a key role in the heavy loss to New Zealand at the R. Premadasa Stadium.

Sri Lanka elected to bowl first, expecting the fresh surface to behave similarly to earlier matches.

“We thought the pitch would be a good one because it was new. We didn’t expect it to turn that much. It was a collective decision to bowl first. Unfortunately, it didn’t go the way we thought. It became another typical Kettarama wicket where the ball spun.”

New Zealand recovered from 84 for 6 thanks to a late assault, adding 70 runs in the final four overs to reach 168 for 7 — a surge Shanaka admitted proved decisive.

“They bided their time and then exploded. Conceding 70 runs in four overs was disheartening. If we had kept them around 130, we might have had a chance.”

Batting Collapse Seals Fate

Sri Lanka’s reply faltered immediately. Pathum Nissanka fell first ball, and regular wickets derailed the chase. Only Kamindu Mendis (31) and Dunith Wellalage (29) showed resistance, but the target was never seriously threatened.

Shanaka did not hide his frustration.

“We have some of the best batters in the country. Everyone walks out intending to win for Sri Lanka. It’s very disappointing that we couldn’t deliver anything for our fans.”

He also reflected on the narrow defeat to England earlier in the Super 8 stage — a result that, in his view, could have changed the team’s tournament trajectory.

A Campaign of Highs and Lows

Sri Lanka’s World Cup journey started brightly with wins over Ireland, Oman and Australia. However, a shock loss to Zimbabwe in the final group game shifted momentum dramatically.

Subsequent defeats to England and New Zealand ended hopes of a semi-final berth.

With one match remaining against Pakistan in Pallekele, Sri Lanka now play purely for pride.

“I have no words for the fans to say we haven’t given them anything to cheer for. But we will look forward to ending the tournament on a high,” Shanaka concluded.

What Next for Shanaka?

Shanaka’s comments suggest uncertainty over his leadership future. While he remains willing to continue, the final call lies with selectors and Sri Lanka Cricket — decisions likely to shape the next phase of Sri Lanka’s T20 rebuild.

As the curtain falls on a disappointing campaign, attention now turns to accountability, leadership direction, and whether change is on the horizon for Sri Lankan cricket

Continue Reading

Cricket

Co-host Sri Lanka crash out after 61-run hammering by New Zealand in Colombo

Published

on

By

Co-hosts Sri Lanka were knocked out of the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup after suffering a crushing 61-run defeat to New Zealand national cricket team in their Super Eights clash at R. Premadasa Stadium on Tuesday night.

Chasing 169 for victory, Sri Lanka faltered under pressure and limped to 107/8 in their 20 overs — a performance far below expectations for a side playing at home and carrying co-host status.

Powerplay Collapse Set the Tone

The chase never truly began. Sri Lanka crawled to just 20/2 in the Powerplay, a stark contrast to New Zealand’s 44/2 in the first six overs. The early damage left the middle order with too much to do, and the required rate kept climbing.

By the 14-over mark, the hosts were reeling at 71/6, effectively ending hopes of a comeback. The lack of intent against spin and disciplined seam bowling exposed Sri Lanka’s fragile batting unit on a surface that offered grip but was far from unplayable.

New Zealand’s Late Surge the Difference

Ironically, New Zealand themselves were under pressure at 88/6 in 14 overs. However, a crucial 50-run stand between Mitchell Santner and Cole McConchie in the death overs swung momentum decisively.

The Black Caps plundered 70 runs in the final phase, finishing on 168/7 — a total that proved more than enough against Sri Lanka’s timid response.

The boundary count told the full story:

  • New Zealand: 8 sixes, 13 fours (100 runs in boundaries)
  • Sri Lanka: 1 six, 8 fours (38 runs in boundaries)

In modern T20 cricket, such disparity is unforgiving.

Tactical Questions for the Hosts

Sri Lanka’s elimination is particularly disappointing given their familiarity with conditions and strong home support. The batting approach appeared overly cautious, and the inability to rotate strike compounded the pressure.

Their 46% dot-ball percentage further underlined the stagnation in the chase — a worrying sign at this level.

As co-hosts, expectations were high for a deep run. Instead, Sri Lanka exit the tournament with serious questions over:

  • Batting intent in high-pressure chases
  • Middle-order stability
  • Tactical flexibility in crunch moments

End of the Roa

With this defeat, Sri Lanka’s Super Eights campaign comes to a premature end, while New Zealand march on with confidence and momentum.

For Sri Lanka, the heartbreak is magnified by the fact that the dream has ended on home soil — under the Colombo lights, in front of their own fans.

A tournament that promised pride and progress now closes with reflection and regret.

Continue Reading

Cricket

Sri Lanka vs New Zealand in T20 World Cup: Head-to-Head Record, Past Results & Winning Trends

Published

on

By

As Sri Lanka prepare to face New Zealand in the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup, history shows a competitive rivalry — but one where the Black Caps hold a slight statistical edge.

Here’s a closer look at the Sri Lanka vs New Zealand head-to-head record, their T20 World Cup results, and recent winning momentum.

Overall T20 Head-to-Head Record

  • Total Matches: 28
  • New Zealand Wins: 16
  • Sri Lanka Wins: 11
  • No Result: 1

New Zealand have won 57% of the encounters, giving them the overall advantage. However, Sri Lanka have delivered key performances on the World Cup stage.

Sri Lanka vs New Zealand – T20 World Cup History

2007 – Sri Lanka’s Dominant Chase

Johannesburg
New Zealand: 164/7
Sri Lanka: 168/3 (18.5 overs)
Result: Sri Lanka won by 7 wickets

Sanath Jayasuriya’s 61 guided Sri Lanka to a comfortable chase. It remains one of Sri Lanka’s strongest T20 World Cup wins over New Zealand.

2010 – Last-Ball Drama

Providence
Sri Lanka: 135/6
New Zealand: 139/8 (19.5 overs)
Result: New Zealand won by 2 wickets

Sri Lanka defended hard, but New Zealand held their nerve to win with one ball remaining.

2012 – Thriller in Pallekele

Pallekele
New Zealand: 174/7
Sri Lanka: 174/6
Match tied – Sri Lanka won Super Over

One of the most dramatic T20 World Cup games between the two sides. Sri Lanka held their composure in the Super Over on home soil.

2022 – New Zealand’s Big Win

Sydney
New Zealand: 167/7
Sri Lanka: 102 all out
Result: New Zealand won by 65 runs

A heavy defeat for Sri Lanka, marked by a batting collapse while chasing 168.

Recent Form Comparison

New Zealand – Last 5 Matches

W, W, L, W, Abandoned
Strong consistency
Clinical in pressure situations

Sri Lanka – Last 5 Matches

W, W, W, L, L
Positive run earlier
Slight dip in recent matches

New Zealand appear slightly more consistent heading into recent contests, while Sri Lanka’s form has fluctuated.

Key Trends from Past Meetings

Sri Lanka Succeed When Chasing Well

Both their World Cup successes (2007 and 2012 Super Over) came when they handled pressure calmly.

New Zealand Dominate with Bowling Discipline

In 2010 and 2022, New Zealand’s structured bowling attacks made the difference.

Big Margins Favour New Zealand

Sri Lanka’s wins tend to be controlled or tight.
New Zealand’s wins often come through dominant bowling or strong finishing.

Winning Edge: Who Holds It

  • New Zealand Advantage: Overall record, recent dominant World Cup win (2022), balanced bowling attack.
  • Sri Lanka Advantage: Ability to thrive in pressure moments, strong spin resources, better familiarity with subcontinental conditions.

Final Analysis

New Zealand hold the statistical upper hand in T20 internationals and recent World Cup meetings. However, Sri Lanka have proven they can rise in high-pressure tournament moments — particularly when chasing or playing at home.

For Sri Lanka to shift the balance, they must:

  • Avoid middle-order collapses
  • Strike early in the Powerplay
  • Control New Zealand’s middle overs
  • Execute death bowling with precision

With history showing close contests and dramatic finishes, the Sri Lanka vs New Zealand rivalry remains one of the more balanced matchups in T20 World Cup cricket.

Continue Reading

Trending