Connect with us

News

Wanindu Hasaranga suspended for two matches

Published

on

Wanindu Hasaranga, the captain of Sri Lanka’s T20I team, has been suspended for two international matches due to his accumulation of demerit points. This suspension comes after his latest breach of the ICC Code of Conduct, for which he received a 50 percent fine and three demerit points. Hasaranga was found guilty of personal abuse towards a player, player support personnel, umpire, or match referee during an international match, which is a violation of article 2.13 of the ICC Code of Conduct. As a result, his five demerit points have converted to two suspension points. Two suspension points lead to a ban from either one Test match or two ODIs or T20Is, whichever comes first for the player or player support personnel. Consequently, Hasaranga will be suspended for Sri Lanka’s first two T20Is against Bangladesh next month. The incident occurred after the match when Hasaranga confronted umpire Lyndon Hanibal to express his criticism of a decision. Additionally, Rahmanullah Gurbaz, an Afghanistan player, has also been penalized. He has been fined 15 percent of his match fee for breaching Level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct in the same match. Rahmanullah was found to have disobeyed an umpire’s instruction during an international match, which is a violation of article 2.4 of the Code.

Furthermore, one demerit point has been added to Rahmanullah’s disciplinary record, as it was his second offense within a 24-month period, bringing his cumulative demerit points to two.

Rahmanullah was sanctioned for repeatedly changing the grip of his bat during the game, despite being warned not to do so. Both players acknowledged their wrongdoing and accepted the sanctions proposed by Chris Broad of the Emirates ICC Elite Panel of Match Referees. Consequently, formal hearings were deemed unnecessary. The charges were brought forth by on-field umpires Lyndon Hannibal and Raveendra Wimalasiri, third umpire Ruchira Palliyaguruge, and fourth umpire Ranmore Martinez. For Level 2 breaches, players face a penalty ranging from 50 to 100 percent of their match fee, along with three or four demerit points. On the other hand, Level 1 breaches result in a minimum punishment of an official reprimand, a maximum penalty of 50 percent of the player’s match fee, and one or two demerit points.

Cricket

Sri Lanka Women’s U-19s Secure Easy Win

Published

on

By

Sri Lanka Under-19 Women produced an impressive all-round performance to register a comfortable 52-run victory over England Under-19 Women in their second match of the Tri-Series played in Australia today.

After winning the toss and electing to bat first, Sri Lanka posted a competitive total of 170 in 42.4 overs. The innings was anchored by a composed half-century from Limansa Thilakarathne, who led the batting effort with confidence and maturity. Despite a few setbacks in the middle order, Sri Lanka managed to build useful partnerships to reach a challenging total.

In response, England Under-19 Women struggled to gain momentum against a disciplined Sri Lankan bowling attack and were bowled out for 118 in 42.1 overs. B. Gillgrass top-scored with 35 off 60 balls, while B. Willis remained unbeaten on 20, but lacked support from the rest of the batting line-up.

Sri Lanka’s bowlers delivered a clinical performance, with A. Thalagune leading the charge with an outstanding spell of 3 for 11. C. Praboda also impressed, claiming 3 for 13 to seal the victory.

Continue Reading

Cricket

SLC Sets the Record Straight on Player Fitness Reports Amid Controversy

Published

on

By

Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) has moved swiftly to counter widespread reports alleging that 19 national cricketers failed a recent Physical Performance Test, labeling the claims as misleading and unfounded. The governing body stressed that the narrative circulating in the media does not reflect the true outcome of its ongoing player evaluation process.

In a strongly worded clarification, SLC stated that the report, which emerged on April 3, lacked proper verification and has caused unnecessary concern among fans while potentially damaging the credibility of the national setup. The board reaffirmed its commitment to accuracy and professionalism in all aspects of team management.

As part of its routine quarterly review conducted between February and April 2026, SLC confirmed that several prominent players have successfully met the required fitness standards. Among them are Dinesh Chandimal, Charith Asalanka, Dhananjaya de Silva, Maheesh Theekshana, Akila Dananjaya, Lahiru Udara, and Prabath Jayasuriya.

At the same time, SLC clarified that a group of players has not yet completed the test due to legitimate circumstances. Fast bowler Matheesha Pathirana and all-rounder Wanindu Hasaranga are among those undergoing rehabilitation, alongside Bhanuka Rajapaksa, Binura Fernando, and Lahiru Kumara, whose testing has been deferred accordingly.

The cricket board emphasized that fitness benchmarks remain an essential part of maintaining international standards, but assessments are handled with consideration for player health and recovery. Officials also called for responsible journalism, urging media platforms to verify facts before publication to prevent confusion and protect the integrity of the sport.

With preparations ongoing for upcoming international fixtures, SLC’s clarification aims to restore confidence and shift focus back to performance and development within the national team.

Continue Reading

Cricket

Sri Lanka Cricket’s Fitness Overhaul Exposes Gaps as Players Lag Behind

Published

on

By

Sri Lanka Cricket’s renewed push for higher fitness standards has brought mixed results, with a significant number of centrally contracted players yet to meet the required benchmarks. Among those still pending their mandatory fitness assessments are Wanindu Hasaranga and Matheesha Pathirana, two key figures expected to feature in the IPL 2026, according to a report by ESPN.

Out of the 45 players holding central contracts, only 24 have successfully passed the fitness tests so far. Fifteen players, including Hasaranga and Pathirana, are yet to complete the process, while six others have reportedly failed at least one attempt. The reasons behind the delays range from injury setbacks to logistical challenges, creating uncertainty around player availability in the near term.

Hasaranga’s situation remains particularly unclear. The leg-spinning all-rounder has been sidelined since suffering a left hamstring injury during Sri Lanka’s opening match of the T20 World Cup against Ireland in February. With no confirmed timeline for his fitness test and no request submitted yet for a No Objection Certificate, doubts continue to linger over his immediate return to competitive cricket.

Pathirana, on the other hand, appears to be making steady progress in his recovery. After picking up a calf strain during a T20 World Cup fixture against Australia, the fast bowler has resumed bowling in the nets. Those close to the player remain optimistic that he could travel to India by mid-April for his IPL commitments. His fitness test is expected to take place soon, although an official date has not been announced.

The stricter fitness regime introduced by Sri Lanka Cricket is not limited to the national setup. It has also been implemented in the ongoing National Super League, though with less demanding criteria. Players in the domestic tournament are required to meet basic thresholds in a 2km run and a skin-fold test, without a points-based system.

In contrast, centrally contracted players are evaluated through a more comprehensive scoring structure that includes sprinting, agility, and jump tests, alongside endurance and body composition assessments. A minimum score is required to pass, reflecting the board’s intent to elevate overall athletic standards within the national pool.

The impact of these measures is already evident at the domestic level. Of the 87 players participating in the National Super League, 23 have failed to meet the minimum fitness standards. These players have been given until April 19 to qualify. While they are still allowed to compete in the interim, failure to pass within the deadline could result in financial penalties, including the loss of match fees, and may affect their future participation in the tournament.

Continue Reading

Trending